Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:49

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ending Parole for 500,000 Migrants Creates New Headaches for Employers - WSJ
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s the best local food you’ve ever tried while traveling?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Hailee Steinfeld & Josh Allen marry in west coast ceremony - Buffalo Rumblings
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is the problem between Turkey and Greece?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Tesla Stock Is Falling on a Downgrade. The Musk-Trump Feud Isn’t Helping. - Barron's
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.